PagePerfect: the Promise of Desktop Publishing Realized
Now, PagePerfect has arrived. And suddenly PC desktop publishing is a lot simpler and less expensive, because PagePerfect integrates desktop publishing, word processing, and graphics editing all in one package.
The 1980’s was a time of growth in personal computing and one industry was progressing rapidly. Previously in order to get printed more than just words, you had to use a complex arrangement of type, masking, screening; all done by hand. Now with a personal computer you could design and print well designed layouts. There were many software applications who came on the scene in these early days. My personal favorite was QuarkXPress, I used the software in the early 1990’s and spent the next few years working in a commercial printshop using the software. What once took a team of skilled workers to set copy, mask, blueline, etc took only one person with the right software.
I recently came across a set of floppy disks for some software called PagePerfect, by a well known software company IMSI.
This article in a 1988 PC Magazine announces this new revolutionary software. This was early on in the days of computer desktop publishing and even on a DOS system the software was powerful. It didn’t always get the best reviews in terms of ease of use, but it was well built. The company behind this powerful software wasn’t IMSI as you might expect, it was programed by a different company, Beyond Words, started by three former MicroPro employees, the makers of WordStar. Beyond Words liked to “leave sales to others” which included IMSI and a big contract with Canon called their Desktop Publishing System.
IMSI was able to market the software well and was well priced. The name PagePerfect didn’t last long and soon after they renamed the software IMSI Publisher in 1989. I’m not 100% sure, but it might have to do with WordPerfect asserting some copyright to the name around that same time. By 1990, the software was not seen much anymore, but another name pops up, Beyond Words Composer 2.0.
All three versions of the software have a very similar interface.
But the one thing they all have in common is their file formats. Unfortunately they used the same extensions many word processing software used during this time and after. .DOC and also .STY which was used frequently by Microsoft Word as well. It makes sense, a Document is shortened to DOC and a Stylesheet is shortened to STY. So if you have any DOC files which don’t open in Word, you might look here. The other problem is the file format used is not plain text and is in a binary proprietary format.
The one positive is the very obvious strings of text in the header. [BWDB] and [BWDOC], which one could infer as Beyond Words DB and Beyond Words Document. A later Beyond Words Composer document has the same header but a higher version number.
I haven’t been able to find any specific bytes which differentiate the Stylesheets from the Documents. They may be the same format, but for now we will consider them the same. These stylesheets seem to function as a template which are often the same format.
Apart from the document layout, the software can also create and use databases. Which appear to be a similar format but with different offsets.
Prior to me diving into this format, the only tool which had some information on this format was TrID, which identified all the DOC and STY files as Beyond Words Composer style. Which is mostly true. Hopefully with this background you can be aware of the different software names this format was used with and with some luck convert the files to something less proprietary.
Some disks that came with my PagePerfect install disks do have some personal documents created with the software, but I wonder how much this software really was used in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, because after that point, you don’t hear about the software anymore. There is some references to the software getting absorbed into another software, IBM DisplayWrite 5/2. I would be curious if others have come across this file format.
Most of what you will find on this blog is file format identification. I see this as the first step in a longer process of preservation and ultimately access. Hopefully the analysis of some file formats can help make better decisions when needing to render the file in an emulator or migrate to another format. I don’t spend much time trying to parse the files I look at to understand the actual content, just enough to properly identify and differentiate between important versions of the format.
One area I sometimes touch on, but often skim over is encryption. Many file formats are binary, meaning they use a sequence of bytes to encode data which is more efficient than human readable text and is often compressed. The bytes used to store data is designed by the developer of the software, they can encode the data however they choose, which is often unreadable by anyone else and is proprietary. A file can also be further encrypted by a password to limit use, even with the right software.
I recently had one of the numerous fans of this blog reach out and ask about the post I made on the software Student Writing Center. They had a bunch of journal files from their youth and couldn’t find a way to read these older files. I offered my help as I still have the software and a nice emulator to run the old software.
As I was going through and converting the journal entries into a PDF. I came across a few which asked for a password to open. You can see below the explanation from the help menu confirms the file format is a proprietary format only readable by their software and the password feature is to further protect the content.
Finding a few of the journal documents password protected was frustrating at first. I was converting some documents that are over 26 years years old, I doubted the password would be remembered. When I asked, they gave me a couple passwords to try, but nothing worked. But I don’t give up that easily!
My first thought was to take all the text from the other journal entries and make a dictionary and then use it to try and brute-force the password. There are some great tools to do this like hashcat. With tools like this, you need to retrieve a hash of the password. This is an encrypted sequence of the password stored in the file. So the first step was to find where the password was stored in the file. Since I have the software and can make new password protected files using a password of my choice this proved a simple task. Create two identical files, add a password to each but different. Then compare the two files in a hex editor to find the difference.
There it is. The password field in the software only let me put in 10 characters and these 10 bytes lit up when I ran a difference between the two files. I went to check the files given to me which also had password protection and found they also had a similar pattern. In fact I noticed from a few checks that the passwords I used also had a pattern in the file.
For this file I used the number “1” ten times. In that same location it repeated the same byte value”85″, 10 times. After a couple more tests I could see this wasn’t an algorithm I need to crack, but a simple replacement. I created a few more files using all the letters in the alphabet and all the numbers and came up with a substitution cypher.
Obviously the passwords used in the documents I was trying to open didn’t all use the full 10 characters, but the password was always preceded by the values “00” and had the values “1A46461A” after the password. The byte prior to the “00” indicates the length of the password. From there I just needed to decode the bytes between those two offsets.
So for this file with an 8 byte sequence “90D54F4FA3FBBA94” decodes to: password. How cool is that? To make things even easier, the passwords used in Student Writing Center are not case sensitive. There are additional values for symbols. You can see the entire substitution list here.
One other thing related to identification. Would it be important to identify a password protected file differently than a regular file? At offset 0xDA there seems to be a indicator that the file is password protected. “00” if not “01” if protected.
What do you think? Should this property be identified as a separate file format from a regular file or is this property something that should be gathered using additional tools that can gather additional properties from a file like this?
Speaking of additional tools. There is a pretty cool project called the Import library for legacy Mac documents or libmwaw which claims to have support for Student Center Writing documents and a lot more. It indeed does, but not the journal format, only the main letter format. I bet it wouldn’t take much to add the journal format to the library, something I will look into.
If you have been following previous posts about Floppy disk flux captures, you may have read about the HFE or A2R flux image formats. Both very useful in the preservation, archiving and emulation of old software and games stored on decaying and copy-protected floppy disks. I also built a Fluxengine which has come in handy more than once. It captures flux data in its own FLUX format. At work I also have access to a Kryoflux board which captures in separate RAW tracks.
Today we are looking at the SCP format. I recently purchased a Greaseweazle for personal use and the main format used while capturing raw flux data is SCP. It works a little better on my older MacBook Pro than the fluxengine and I wanted to have another option for capturing flux data. So far it has worked really well. Of course I wanted to know everything I could about the SCP format so the first thing I did was run Siegfried against a file.
filename : 'unknown.scp' filesize : 47017278 modified : 2025-06-14T19:09:58-06:00 errors : matches : - ns : 'pronom' id : 'UNKNOWN' format : version : mime : class : basis : warning : 'no match' - ns : 'wikidata' id : 'Q29000565' format : 'SuperCard Pro dump' URI : 'http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q29000565' permalink : 'https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?oldid=1866792367&title=Q29000565' mime : 'application/octet-stream' basis : 'extension match scp; byte match at 0, 3 (Wikidata reference is empty)'
Looks like Wikidata has a signature pattern, but PRONOM does not. Lets take a look and see how difficult it might be.
Well, probably not hard at all. I love easy well understood headers. But only three bytes can have issues, lets look a little closer at the published specification. Before we dive into the spec, it might be good to note a few things. The SCP image format was developed for another hobby board. A Supercard Pro, is a custom board to connect a floppy drive through USB to software which can also capture flux data and help interpret the data to a image format which can be used to write back to a floppy or used in an emulator. The software is Windows only so those on Linux or MacOS can’t use it, but since the specification was made public, many other boards and tools can read and write to the format. Even though it is open, I worry about preserving the spec. When you try and ensure it is saved in the WayBackMachine you get this fun page.
This sorry page is usually found when the owner of a URL has asked specifically for their domain to be excluded from the web archive. This worries me as I have found many specifications have been lost to time. I would love to know why the owner has chosen to do this, but it is available now, so lets dive in. The versions appear to have started in 2014, but the page is copyright 2012, so I assume the format was created around this time. It was last updated in February of 2024, so is pretty up-to-date. One important update was made in 2021:
v2.3 - 06/03/21
* Added additional FLAG bit (bit 7) to identify a 3rd party flux creator. PLEASE SET THIS BIT IF YOU ARE A 3RD PARTY DEVELOPER USING THE SCP FORMAT!
This update to version 2.3 added a bit to indicate the 3rd party flux creator. This means a board like the Greaseweazle will indicate its software as the creator instead of a SCP created by SuperCard Pro.
The header of an SCP file is comprised of a few bytes, not just the ASCII “SCP”.
All offsets are the start of the file (byte 0) unless otherwise stated. The .scp image consists of a disk definition header, the track data header offset table, and the flux data for each track (preceeded by Track Data Header). The image file format is described below:
BYTES 0x00-0x02 contains the ASCII of "SCP" as the first 3 bytes. If this is not found, then the file is not ours.
With Byte 0x03, we will see the version of the software which created the SCP. In my sample, created by my Greaseweazle, did not add a number here, only “00”. Byte 0x04 is the disk type, there is some set definitions in the spec for this byte. My test sample uses “80”, but not sure what that represents. Bytes 5-7 are used for other disk information, but byte 8 is where we find the flags which include a bit for flux creator. My sample has the value “23”, but since we are looking at the individual bit level, the value will be a combination of all the bits in the flag area. The individual bits are, “00100011”, so since the seventh bit is set, then the SCP was created by 3rd party which is correct.
So the only reliable static data in the header will be those first 3 bytes. There is some bytes later in the file which should be static. That is the start of the Tracks, which include a Track Data Header. We can see from the spec, the last byte in the main header is 0x2AF, which makes the main header 687 bytes long. Starting on the 688 byte, or 0x2B0 is the ASCII string TRK. Adding these 3 bytes should make for a nice signature.
000002b0 54 52 4b 00 a9 86 65 00 5e b5 00 00 28 00 00 00 |TRK...e.^...(...| 000002c0 ab 86 65 00 60 b5 00 00 e4 6a 01 00 56 87 65 00 |..e.`....j..V.e.| 000002d0 60 b5 00 00 a4 d5 02 00 00 39 00 7e 00 7c 00 ce |`........9.~.|..| 000002e0 00 c7 00 c7 00 cd 00 7e 00 7c 00 eb 00 4f 00 60 |.......~.|...O.`| 000002f0 00 39 00 77 00 cd 00 7c 00 7f 00 ce 00 c7 00 c6 |.9.w...|........| 00000300 00 ce 00 7a 00 80 00 cd 00 c8 00 c6 00 ce 00 7b |...z...........{|
We could use the TRK string for identification, but looking further into the spec, we can also see the SCP format may contain a footer.
Here is the tail of my sample file, you can see it contains the ASCII characters listed here for the last four bytes. It also contains an application string, indicating the Greaseweazle software used to create the file. All every helpful information. We can also see on the 5th to last byte the value “24”, this indicates the file format version being used. Version 2.4 being used in this file but we know 2.5 is the latest. I wonder if it would be valuable to have separate identification for version 1 and 2 of the format? Could also consider assigning version 2.3 and 2.4 as unique as they will have the additional 3rd party information.
So maybe we don’t need the TRK header in our signature, just the first 3 bytes and last 4 bytes. I believe this should allow for proper identification, while avoiding false positives.
I have a proposal for a PRONOM signature and a sample file on my Github page. Other samples files can be found all over the interwebs, with many on archive.org.
A few of you may remember a couple years ago reading in a Vice article about Eric Roth and his use of an old DOS only software program for writing all his Hollywood scripts. The Vice article was based on some earlier reporting in 2014 about his writing process. You can watch the full interview of Eric Roth on YouTube.
I remember seeing a link to the Vice article a couple years ago and finding the screenwriters use of an old DOS program, Movie Master, funny and interesting. He says in his interview that out of half superstition and half fear of change he prefers to use this very old software to write his screenplays. It’s so old and obsolete, he can’t even email the files to Hollywood. He has to print them out and have the studio scan them into modern software for use. The interview shows the screen of his old Windows computer and you can see the software he is using.
Of course because I love researching obsolete software and formats so much, I wanted to know if the scripts generated by “Movie Master”, version 3.09, are in a format that needed to be documented. I was a little surprised that this version of Movie Master was no where to be found. It was on none of the old abandoned software sites. Not on Internet Archive, no where it seemed. I did find a later version of Movie Master, version 5, but found this software was not the same thing.
The original programmer of Movie Master was Adam Greissman, which you can clearly see in the screenshot above. The software was copyright Comprehensive Video Supply in the 1980’s, but the Movie Master version 5 was developed by Ballistic Software, Inc, which was also known as “Comprehensive Cinema Software” or “Hollywood Cinema Software” later in the 1990’s.
According to a very in depth article by Daniel Plagens, Reinventing the Typewriter, mentions Adam Greissman not wanting to move the software from DOS to Windows as he didn’t feel there was enough of a market at the time. As it turns out the founder of Comprehensive Video Supply, Jules Leni, got a lot of pressure from users of Movie Master after Greissman, who left the company in 1991, to develop a Windows and Macintosh version of the software. They released this new version in October of 1996.
Let’s take a look at a couple of example files from version 5.
Version 5 of Movie Master uses the extension SCR, which one could assume is short for “Script”. There does appear to be a header before any readable text starts, so that will be helpful in identification. Currently there is only one PUID, x-fmt/100, in PRONOM with the extension SCR, which happens to be for an AutoCAD script and has no signature, so anything you ask DROID or Siegfried to identify with the SCR extension will default to an AutoCAD script, which is frustrating. According to the File Format Wiki, there are quite a few formats with the SCR extension. More work to be done there for sure.
So I tried for a few weeks to find a copy of Movie Master version 3.09, I even put in a eBay favorite search for the name so it would alert me to a copy being sold, but no such luck. I gave up for awhile, then recently someone posted a link to a large collection of early warez. Warez is the name given to software that has been illegally copied. When I followed the link and searched though the vast amount of software titles, I got excited to see a couple matches to “Movie Master”. After a little wrangling of some downloads, I spun up a copy of DOSBox and low and behold, Movie Master 3.09!
A lot of people have compared the old DOS scriptwriting tools to early word processors like Word, Perfect Writer, WordStar, etc. They did much of the same thing, but with special controls for helping with scenes, characters, indents, and everything writers needed to make some of the best Hollywood films out there. As Daniel Plagens noted:
The program proved popular for many years. Greissman estimates they sold over 10,000 units—“saturating the market,” as he put it—and recalls seeing help wanted ads in Hollywood Reporter and Variety where knowledge of Movie Master was a hiring requirement. He visited the sets of Days of Thunder and Hunt for Red October to help their writers and production teams acclimate to Movie Master.
Makes me wonder where all the old scripts from Hollywood movies are located in their electronic form? I am sure Eric Roth probably has quite the collection of different scripts he has written. I sure hope he backs them up and donates them to a library in the future.
Well, let’s take a look at a couple sample files from Movie Master version 3 and version 4. Version 4.04 was also in the collection uploaded to Internet Archive.
The first thing to notice is they all start with the version number of the software which wrote the file. Really nice to have, but a terrible magic header. The files also all begin (after the version number) and end with the Hex value “0A”. Which happens to be a line feed control character. So super common, but could be helpful. Another pattern is that on the 9th byte it is “31” on most of the samples and “36” on one of them. “31” is the start of the ASCII number sequence, so could be the sequence number for the script as each SCR file could only store what was in memory.
I fear the rest of the format will have the same issue most word processors had at the time which is not having a header, but lots of formatting codes which may or may not be in every file, making programatic identification difficult. Might take awhile to identify all the formatting codes, but could lead to better identification and possibly an import module for tools like LibeOffice or Final Draft.
I didn’t find much different with Movie Master 4, seemed to have the same restrictions to 16 files in a script. The files from version 4 also seem to follow the same patterns from version 3. But both versions are different from the the Windows version of Movie Master, version 5. Click here for Movie Master 5 help menu on “Introduction for Movie Master DOS Users“.
There was another elusive script writing software title which adds to the confusion. Scriptware was another screenwriting software tool which seems to have had a large following. They produced a Windows and Macintosh version. It also started out for DOS and also used the SCR extension. The website is still active for the software, but hasn’t updated in 24 years. I wrote a little about in my post on PROmotion. All the demo versions out there are not useable demos, but animation demos. In this nice batch of old software on the Internet Archive I was able to find an early copy. Wasn’t able to get it to run, but the folder did have some samples.
Luckily, they make it quite easy to identify these SCR files. ScriptWare was very popular and continued on with Windows and Macintosh versions. Later on, the format was changed along with the extension, which changed to SW3.
The SCR extension has been used often. On my desktop they default as a Paintbrush document. Apparently SCR is sometimes used as an extension for the ZSoft Paintbrush (PCX) format. It is also used on older postscript fonts on the Macintosh as a Type 1 screen font. Can also be a screensaver on Windows, but watch out, they can hide malicious code. You get the idea, SCR is a very common extension, identifying it up front can help avoid problems later!
Moral of the story is to never give up searching for old software and even though illegal copying of software should be avoided, I am grateful to those who help save abandoned software. Without them many titles would be lost.
I don’t have a good signature for these formats yet, but you can find a few samples on my GitHub page.
Receiving electronic media from an outside source can be an adventure. Often times you find yourself sorting the valuable files and separating them from the chaff. There can be hidden files, cache files, application files, drivers, and everything in between. Determining what formats are important can sometimes be difficult, especially if you don’t know the file format of some of the files.
I was recently working on a collection of files which had been produced through some audio software. When working with audio, a WAVE file is what is usually kept as they contain the actual audio data. With these files they came with a couple other formats. One of those formats was a bunch of SFK peak files. These files are meant to be temporary as they are generated from the WAVE file to make opening of audio data faster. They are important, but can easily be regenerated. One could argue they have historical value, but also they don’t contain anything that can be used by itself, so alone they don’t have much value.
The other format found with the WAVE files have a CDP extension. These came up as unknown when using DROID. It is not a common extension so finding the name of the software which created the files wasn’t too hard. Let’s take a look at one of them.
Huh, this is a RIFF file. RIFF is most commonly used as the container used for WAVE and AVI files. You can read more about the RIFF format on a previous post. The RIFF container format can be used for all sorts of things. Looking at the internals we can see a few unique list chunk’s.
Lots of references to other files, specifically WAVE files. But not a lot of actual data. That is because this format turns out to be just a project format for some software called “CD Architect“. Sonic Foundry was an audio software developer for a few years before they sold their catalog to Sony in 2003. In looking at the manual for CD Architect version 5.2, it explains the CDP Project format.
CD Architect software handles the organization of your CD using a small project file (CDP) that saves information about source file locations, edits, cuts, and insertion points. This project file is not a multimedia file, but is instead used to create the CD when editing is finished.
Looking at another CDP file from the collection, I noticed something different.
That’s odd, the RIFF format is always uppercase ASCII, this is lowercase. Also the important RIFF form, which was “SFPJ” in the other sample, is missing. This is not a valid RIFF format.
But further down in the file I can see the same list chunks. Did they take RIFF format and make a proprietary version of their own? I think they may have. It seems the first example was from CD Architect version 4 and these other files are from CD Architect version 5. That complicates things. Sony stopped developing CD Architect after version 5.2d and maintained it for a few years before selling many of their titles to MAGIX Software. As far as I know there was never any new versions released. The software was very popular, as it had some really nice audio mastering features and was easy to use. Many were upset when the software was abandoned.
Creating a signature for both version 4 and version 5 CDP files will be pretty straightforward. I feel knowing what you have in a collection you are processing is the first step in making informed decisions. Wether or not you keep the project files are up for debate. Some may only want the final audio created from a CD Architect project, while others may want to see the way the audio was put together and mixed. Either way, the more you know…..
One more thing. CD Architect would default to saving a CDP project file, but could also save a “CD Image file”. This process actually would save the project to a full WAVE file with some extras baked in.
An image file is essentially a wave file with volume, crossfades, effects, mixes, and track information embedded. Burning an image file will reduce the risk of buffer underruns (especially if you have a complex project or are using a slow computer) since no audio processing is required.
Interesting, normally when working with track information in a single WAVE file you would need a companion CUE Sheet in order to reference the track layout of the Audio CD. So I am curious how they do all of this. Lets take a look at a “CD Image”.
mediainfo CDArch52d-s02.wav General Complete name : CDArch52d-s02.wav Format : Wave Format settings : PcmWaveformat File size : 5.05 MiB Duration : 30 s 0 ms Overall bit rate mode : Constant Overall bit rate : 1 411 kb/s Conformance errors : 2 RIFF : Yes General compliance : File size 5292434 is less than expected size 5292823 (offset 0x8) WAVE : Yes General compliance : Element size 5292811 is more than maximal permitted size 5292422 (offset 0xC)
Audio Format : PCM Format settings : Little / Signed Codec ID : 1 Duration : 30 s 0 ms Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 1 411.2 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 44.1 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 5.05 MiB (100%)
Already seeing some issues with the format, but all the important bits are there. JHOVE doesn’t like them much either.
JHOVE is giving me two issues. The major error is the file appears truncated according to both MediaInfo and JHOVE. The InfoMessage which is less of an issue but more of a heads up that the WAVE file has an extra LIST type. “PQLS”, which was also in the CPD RIFF file we looked at earlier. So it seems by making a “CD Image” of a project embeds the project chunk data into the WAVE container. Identification is not an issue as these WAVE’s follow the standard pattern and therefore identify correctly, but one might want to be aware through further characterization these WAVE’s have some not so obvious extra data.
My attempts to find any samples from version 3 of CD Architect have failed. Until then, my proposal is to add version 4 & 5 to PRONOM with the signature on my Github page. There you will find a few samples as well.
Years ago I bought my first digital camera. It was an Epson PhotoPC 3100z and I bought it because it could capture a digital image directly to a TIFF file. I don’t think most people would care about such a feature, but I thought it was awesome. Granted it filled up the small 32MB compact flash card pretty quick, I had to upgrade to a 512MB card, that set me back.
TIFF images are pretty universal, they have a well known structure and have been around for a very long time. I have written about TIFF’s before, so I wont go into too much about the format. The format is well respected in the preservation community, although one of the best websites, Aware Systems, documenting the various TIFF tags has gone dark in the this year, here is an archived version.
Many of the digital camera’s from the beginning to now use the TIFF format to store RAW sensor data. Most use their own extension and follow well established methods for storing the sensor data in an IFD with lots of common and custom tags. The DNG format is an open RAW format which uses the TIFF format to store sensor data, although many use SubIFD’s and can be incompatible with some software.
The first Digital Camera was invented by a Kodak employee, Steve Sasson in 1975, well, he was the first to use a CCD sensor in a self contained unit. This led Kodak to push the technology forward and in 1991 released the Kodak DCS digital system which used Nikon cameras equipped with a digital sensor. These early digital cameras were quite expensive, they used early CF cards and SCSI connections. Kodak released a few models of the DCS series, first on Nikon bodies, then on some Canon bodies. These early cameras used the TIFF format to store the RAW sensor data. For some reason, they decided to use a proprietary method and compression while still using the TIF extension.
Kodak was responsible for many new image file formats. Not sure why they decided to use a common format like TIFF and still use the TIF extension, but make it proprietary. The RAW file created by the DCS series of camera’s had to be opened with special plugins or software, if you tried to open the TIFF’s with anything else, you would only see the small thumbnail image located at IFD0 instead of the full size image hidden in a SubIFD1.
Finding samples of this format is particularly hard as they have the common TIF extension. The camera’s are also pretty rare and finding one is difficult, especially in working condition. I was only aware of a couple samples on the rawsamples.ch site, but that wasn’t enough to understand the format as the two files had a different structure.
There is/was a website called https://raw.pixls.us/, but it has been offline since last June, the regular site still works, but the raw sub-domain is unreachable. Luckily the wayback machine had archived a few samples.
I also found a reference on an older website referring to a sample set maintained by Kodak for developers using the SDK, but also no longer available. You can find the old website also on the wayback machine.
With a few more samples to refer to, it makes it easier to understand the headers and put together a signature. There was an SDK, but seems to be difficult to locate today, but the manual does give us a little more info on the different models and their format.
So from the SDK statement, the samples I have in TIF, and others I have in the more recent DCR format, I can conclude the custom TIF format was used with the DCS 3xx, 4xx, 5xx, 6xx models and from 7xx on the DCR format was used as the camera RAW. Looking closer at the samples in TIF, we can see all the 4xx models used the “FILE VERSION 3” version of the format, while the others have the full statement in the header. Not 100% clear on which format came first, but the 4xx models are some of the earliest models.
At the time, there was only Kodak software that could properly “develop” the RAW file taken by these camera models. Today that has changed and the format has been added to many open source libraries such as libraw and rawspeed. Many other commercial products also claim to support the DCS models including Adobe Camera Raw, which seems to be able to open these TIF’s.
Distinguishing these RAW TIF’s is important to properly manage them over the long term. These images currently identify in the PRONOM repository as regular TIF’s, fmt/353, so we would need to create a signature which identifies the standard TIFF header, but also uses bytes unique to this format. In the few samples I have the “VERSION 3” images all start with the litte-endian header, “49492A00”, while the other samples start with the big-endian header, “4D4D002A”. That makes it a little easier for each signature.
For for the “VERSION 3” format we could use a pattern such as 49492A00{12}4B4F44414B{11}(444353|454F53444353). This looks for the TIFF header, skips 12 bytes, looks for the word “KODAK”, skips 11 more bytes to then look for either “DCS” or “EOSDCS” right before the camera model number.
For the other format we also look for the TIFF header, but then find the whole string used in all the samples. 4D4D002A{60}5468697320696D6167652066696C652077617320637265617465642062792061204B6F64616B20444353{5}6469676974616C2063616D6572612E
This looks for the big-endian header, then the string, “This image file was created by a Kodak DCS”, skipping the model number, then the end of the string, “digital camera.” This should catch all the different models of this format.
You can find my proposed signature on my GitHub page, since none of the samples belong to me, you can find them above in some of the links.
For #WDPD24 and PRONOM Hackathon week this year, I want to find some older formats listed which did not have a signature. There is a list to choose from, but I wanted to find something I hadn’t worked on before. I came across two entries for Real Video:
PUID
Name
Extension
fmt/204
RealVideo Clip
rv
x-fmt/277
Real Video
rv
I was familiar with Real Media and Real Audio, but had yet to come across any RealVideo with the RV extension. I thought it would be easy to find some references and samples, but that was not the case. I assume PRONOM originally added these based on MIME types available.
Real or RealNetworks is/was an Internet media company who jumped on the rapidly growing World Wide Web in 1995 to become a leader in Internet Media Delivery. Their initial offerings mainly focused on audio streaming and they accomplished all of this by providing free players and web browser extensions to make it easy to serve up a website with streaming media everyone could enjoy. Later adding video streaming optimized for the slower dialup and connections of the day. They used codecs based on common technology like H.263 and H.264, but used then to make their own proprietary codecs identified through FourCC codes, RV10-RV60.
So thought it would be easy to find a reference to the RV extension, I quickly discovered it wasn’t. Looking at the Wikipedia page on RealVideo, I found no reference to the RV extension. RV is an abbreviation for RealVideo, right? Well, I ended up finding a reference in the RealAudio page under file extensions. Ok, First clue to the existence of the RV extension. The page references RV as being used for video only files and was used by the flagship encoder (RealProducer).
RealProducer was the tool for creating the streaming audio and video formats that could then be used for your website or streaming platform. The RealProducer software came in a Basic version, which was free, and the Plus or Pro version, which was not free and provided more options. The first version of RealProducer to make video files was version 4. I was able to find a copy of the encoder and installed it under a Windows 95 emulator. To my surprise it only saved to the RealMedia RM file format. This format is well known and identified with PRONOM as x-fmt/190 also documented at the LoC.
This was the same with RealProducer 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 that I was able to try. All made no mention of the RV extension. I was starting to feel this format didn’t exist or that some decided to use the RV extension on their own. Searches on Google yielded a couple results, mostly from users who had found a few files on their older discs and wanted to migrate them to something newer. I was able to find one example, one user shared, but it had the same header as the RealMedia format. The clue was in the file.
RealProducer Basic 11 for Windows. The Wikipedia article did hint at this by saying “the latest version of RealProducer reverted to using .ra for audio only files and began using .rv for video files with or without audio.” Why would they use the RM extension for so long, then revert to a different extension with a later version? I found more in the User Manual for version 11.
• .rv – RealVideo RealProducer uses the .rv file extension if the input is video-only or video-with-audio. You can also select the .rm file extension for video content. Tip: Using the .rv file extension helps search engines identify the file as a RealVideo clip.
• .rm – RealAudio or RealVideo RealProducer chooses the .rm file extension if it cannot determine the content of the input clip. You can use .rm file extension for any RealAudio or RealVideo clip, except for variable bit-rate clips.
Ok, so a few things to learn from this. One is the RV extension was used as the default for version 11 as they wanted search engines to identify them as a RealVideo clip. Second thing we learned is there is no difference between the two placeholders in PRONOM, one being a RealVideo file and the other being a RealVideo Clip. We don’t need both.
Now, is there any difference between an RV and RM file?
They both look very similar to me. Aside from a few bytes, they are practically identical. Lets see what MediaInfo has to say.
mediainfo Producer11-01.rv General Complete name : Producer11-01.rv Format : RealMedia File size : 164 KiB Duration : 6 s 999 ms Overall bit rate : 225 kb/s Frame rate : 24.000 FPS Copyright : (C) 2005 FileExtension_Invalid : rm rmvb ra
Video ID : 0 Format : RealVideo 4 Codec ID : RV40 Codec ID/Info : Based on AVC (H.264), Real Player 9 Duration : 6 s 999 ms Bit rate : 181 kb/s Width : 640 pixels Height : 424 pixels Display aspect ratio : 3:2 Frame rate : 24.000 FPS Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.028 Stream size : 155 KiB (94%)
Audio ID : 1 Format : Cooker Codec ID : cook Codec ID/Info : Based on G.722.1, Real Player 6 Duration : 7 s 429 ms Bit rate : 44.1 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 44.1 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 40.0 KiB (24%)
mediainfo Producer11-01.rm General Complete name : Producer11-01.rm Format : RealMedia File size : 151 KiB Duration : 6 s 999 ms Overall bit rate : 225 kb/s Frame rate : 24.000 FPS Copyright : (C) 2005
Video ID : 0 Format : RealVideo 4 Codec ID : RV40 Codec ID/Info : Based on AVC (H.264), Real Player 9 Duration : 6 s 999 ms Bit rate : 181 kb/s Width : 640 pixels Height : 424 pixels Display aspect ratio : 3:2 Frame rate : 24.000 FPS Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.028 Stream size : 155 KiB
Audio ID : 1 Format : Cooker Codec ID : cook Codec ID/Info : Based on G.722.1, Real Player 6 Bit rate : 44.1 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Sampling rate : 44.1 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits
Other than the RV file having a invalid file extension, they both identify as a RealMedia file and have identical properties. So it seems the RV file is really no different than the RM file. I think the best course of action for PRONOM is to deprecate these two RV PUID’s and just ad RV as an acceptable extension for the RealMedia format.
To add to the evidence, here is the output from ffprobe:
But wait, there are a couple formats we could add which are related to RealProducer. RealProducer used a few other formats to manage projects and other metadata for streaming. They include:
Don’t get excited, the RealPix Image format really isn’t an image, it is simply an XML file with all the details of an image or group of images. Pretty boring. It was however a big thing in the day, even got a full guide written up for the process. “All information in the file occurs between an opening <imfl> tag and a closing </imfl> tag. This is the only tag that uses an end tag.” This format was the topic of discussion as malicious code could be in the RP file and executed just by having someone load your webpage. IMFL is obviously an acronym, but none of the documents I could find tells me what it stands for, so I did what everyone does now, I asked ChatGPT.
The RealPix format by RealNetworks, which was used for interactive multimedia content, indeed utilized IMFL as its tagged format. IMFL stands for “Interleaved Media File Language.” This markup was particularly designed to handle multimedia presentations, allowing the synchronization of images, audio, and video in a slideshow-style format. It used XML-like syntax where elements like <imfl>, <head>, and <fadein/> defined media objects, transitions, and their timing. Key components included attributes for positioning, color, and animation effects, making RealPix a flexible format for creating multimedia sequences compatible with RealPlayer.
For technical details, the RealPix format closely resembles SMIL (Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language) and supports strict tag closure and case sensitivity. This means all tags and attribute names must be lowercase, and attributes must be in double quotes, as seen in SMIL and RealSystem G2 markup, RealNetworks’ broader multimedia framework.
When I asked for a source, it could not give me one. So not sure if it is the correct answer, but it seems to fit. Here are some samples of RP, RT and SMIL files.
For RealText with the RT extension, we find a similar tagged text. This format is used to provide text presentations to go along with Images, Audio, or Video. The tagged text then describes when and how the text is displayed. This is all done in a player window, therefore the root tag of these RT documents starts and ends with <window>. I guess these could be considered a subtitle format for streaming media.
The SMIL files is interesting, it is known standard, but in many cases, does not have an XML declaration, therefore not identified by current PRONOM. They are used to link everything together. I might suggest a variant of the SMIL format to not have the XML declaration to identify these formats correctly.
The .RPAD RealProducer Audience File, .RPJF RealProducer Job File, .RPSD RealProducer Server Destination are all XML files for managing some of the configuration found in the RealProducer software.
Those three formats should be easy enough, especially if we look for Namespace urls.
The RAM and RPM formats are simply text files with a URL. You can find some samples here and here.
An RM and RV file are the same format as the RMVB file but just with a variable bitrate. Later on a new format was used to improve the quality of video. This format has the extension RMHD, referring to RealMedia HD. Let’s take a look.
The format looks very similar, but has the magic header of .RMP instead of .RMF. MediaInfo and FFProbe are unaware of the format. The software mentions a RV11 codec which is confusing as the codecs went from RV10-RV60.
Phew, that was a lot considering the two formats I tried to research came up the same as an existing format. There are probably others I have missed. I did see a reference to an RMX format which seems to be an encrypted RM file. The header is the same so it will identify as a RealMedia file, but with the wrong extension. Let me know if you come across any. I have some samples of the formats mentioned here, plus a proposal of new signatures on my Github repository.
Last week I had the pleasure of attending the 20th annual iPres conference on Digital Preservation in Ghent, Belgium. I enjoyed hearing from many of my respected colleagues on many aspects of preservation including one of my favorite topics, floppy disks. There was tutorials, lightning talks, and even a workshop, presented by Leontien Talboom, Elizabeth Kata, Chris Knowles, and myself. We titled the workshop “A Guide to Imaging Obscure Floppy Disk Formats“. The workshop was conceived by a mutual interest in imaging Wang 5.25in word processor disks, but expanded to include imaging of Amstrad 3in disks, 240K Brother Typewriter Disks, and Macintosh 400/800k disks.
I brought my hand soldered FluxEngine board and others brought their Greaseweazle board to show off how imaging obscure and uncommon disks can be done on a budget.
Image taken during workshop on a Mavica FD200 Floppy Disk Camera.
During the conference we talked a bit about the different type of hardware that can be used and the difference between a disk image and flux image. There seems to be quite the exhaustive list of different types of file formats, some specific to a platform and others more generic. I recently did a blog post on the formats used by the Applesauce software, which have some unique features.
There are many disk image types which should be researched and added to PRONOM and other format description sites, but today lets take a look at a generic format used by many tools.
The HxC Floppy Emulator file format which the extension HFE is a popular format used with floppy drive emulators. There is a lot of complexity with what is included in many of these image formats, some are simply a raw sector representation of the binary data on a disk, others contain the complete flux readings from a floppy disk. The HFE format contains a little more than a raw image, including a header, a track lookup table, and the bitstreams for each track all with the purpose of emulating the physical media. The HFE format contains only a single pass over the data, where other formats may contain multiple reading of each track to get more complete data which can be helpful for damaged or purposely copy-protected disks. You can read more on Ashley’s blog, Library of Congress format description.
When using the HxC Floppy Emulator software, you can open and save to many different formats. The main format being their HFE native format. It comes in 5 versions.
Above is a hexdump of the main SDCard HxC Floppy Emulator file format. The format specification shows the 8 byte header “HXCPICFE”. This is a very unique pattern and should be all we need to make a robust signature for the format, but we do need to take into account the other HFE “versions” and see if they might clash or need to be identified separately.
The “Rev 2” version also has the same header. But if you look at the 9th byte you can see the value changed from 00 to 01, which according to the specification, this is the revision byte.
This last format seems to be a special HxC stream image.
It seems the best option is to make three signatures to identify the three main headers. Additional software can be used to further parse the disk image. If you would like to see some sample images, you can download a bunch here. You can also take a look at my GitHub repository to see additional samples and a proposed set of signatures.
The year was 2001 and I found myself in need of an audio player and recorder. I had been burning CD’s for a few years, making mixed CD’s was fun and convenient, but I needed more flexibility. After some research I decided on a device that was super popular outside the United States, but was gaining some loyal fans.
This MZ-G750MiniDisc device could record in a standard high quality mode through RCA, optical digital cable, and an optional microphone in mini-plug. This model also had the LP2 and LP4 modes which compressed higher, but could record up to 320 minutes on one MD disc.
Sony accomplished this by using a propriety compression codec called ATRAC, or Adaptive TRansform Acoustic Coding. This compression format was used with the MiniDisc and other Sony devices like the flash memory Walkman’s sold later.
I recorded and stored a lot of music on the few disc’s I purchased over the next year, but as you may have surmised, the iPod came out later that year. I waited a bit but eventually purchased the updated 10GB model and the MiniDisc only was used to make a few recordings over the next little while.
As good as the MiniDisc is, the model I owned could record in a digital format, but lacked the connections to transfer the audio to a computer unless you used the optical cable and captured in real time to a computer with an optical input. This was by design, even when they put USB ports on later models, the software only allowed sending audio to the MiniDisc, but not back from the device.
A few years back I heard of some work the community has done to bring MiniDisc’s back from shadows. Now there is a thriving market and some models can cost a pretty penny. With that came some great tools and the ability to copy from the device back to the computer. The only problem, my device lacks a USB port. I kept my eye out for a “good” deal on a NetMD MiniDisc device. It took some time, but I am happy to report I am now the proud owner of a MZ-N420D.
With a new USB capable NetMD in hand, lets take a look at the different ATRAC formats!
The most common ATRAC formats are the ATRAC3 versions which generally have the extension OMA or OMG. But let’s start with ATRAC1, the format used on my earlier MiniDisc device when captured in Standard Mode. Using the amazing https://webmd.pro/ tool, I was able to connect my new device and “archive” my disc.
ffprobe -i Test1.aea [aea @ 0x7fc5e6c04fc0] Estimating duration from bitrate, this may be inaccurate Input #0, aea, from 'Test1.aea': Duration: 00:00:01.63, bitrate: 302 kb/s Stream #0:0: Audio: atrac1, 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 292 kb/s
ATRAC1 files can have the AEA extension, which ffmpeg can decode, but MediaInfo doesn’t appear to have added the support. According to the decoder the magic numbers for the ATRAC1 format are “Magic is ‘00 08 00 00‘ in little-endian”. This pattern matches my files, but the recent addition PRONOM fmt/1968 doesn’t match all the samples I have.
The magic numbers are too simple to be the only pattern used in a signature. The Track title follows the magic numbers but are not static. Then there are quite a bit of zero bytes, like a lot. All the samples I have seem to have some data around the 260 offset, then more zero bytes until around 2400 to 2800 byte offset range. I scanned all the samples I have through Tridscan, and it looks like the only bytes in common are the magic header, lots of zero’s, and a few strings.
The ffmpeg libavformat code does tell us at byte 264 there will be a 01 or 02 which indicates channels. 44.1 kHz is assumed and the bitrate is calculated from a constant by how many channels, so not much else to identify common patterns. More testing needed.
ATRAC3 is what allowed my original MiniDisc to record in LP2 and LP4, extending the recording time. This format was also how some DRM was added to the device and computer to allow for some checking-in and checking-out of files, but to control their use. This was done with Desktop software from Sony, originally in the form of the title SonicStage, later incorporating OpenMG to manage the DRM. I used SonicStage to encode some audio into OMG and OMA formats.
OpenMG format files
These are audio files which have been converted to ATRAC3 format and encrypted in OpenMG format, which is the copyright protection technology for audio contents specific to OpenMG (with the extension .omg).
ffprobe -i /01-Untitled.omg [oma @ 0x7fed2440e980] Format oma detected only with low score of 1, misdetection possible! [oma @ 0x7fed2440e980] Couldn't find the EA3 header ! /01-Untitled.omg: Invalid data found when processing input
The good news is there appears to be a standard header for the OMG format, but ffmpeg assumes they are OMA files. Turns out OMG was the original form of the format, but was replaced with OMA starting with SonicStage v2.1.
We learned from trying an OMG file in ffprobe that ffmpeg is looking for EA3 header, which is found in this OMA file. Both of these formats should have a nice header to work from for a signature. In fact there has already been a request and signature submitted for the OMA format. Mine are slightly different, but only takes a small tweak to work with all my samples. Also, it seems the extension AA3 was used for awhile before settling on OMA. OMA can have a few different types:
ffprobe -i 02-Untitled.oma [oma @ 0x7fbc7ef047c0] Estimating duration from bitrate, this may be inaccurate Input #0, oma, from '/Star Trek/02-Untitled.oma': Metadata: title : Untitled(2) album : Star Trek OMG_TRACK : 2 OMG_ALBMS : Star Trek OMG_ASGTM : 2366000 OMG_TIT2S : Untitled(2) TLEN : 27000 Duration: 00:00:27.21, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 193 kb/s Stream #0:0: Audio: atrac3p ([1][0][0][0] / 0x0001), 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 192 kb/s
I’ll leave the technical properties to be handled by tools more suited for parsing the format like ffmpeg. Maybe MediaInfo could have the formats added, but until then, it might be best to simply identify the main format. I am also aware of some later additions to the ATRAC family, such as ATRAC3plus, ATRAC Advanced Lossless, and ATRAC9 (WAV RIFF). There are other extensions like AT3 out there which use the ATRAC codec, like Sony’s Playstation or PSP. I will have to keep my eyes out for the even more elusive Hi-MD MiniDisc devices to find out more. For now, take a look at some samples and my proposal for signatures on my GitHub.
Image compression has been around for awhile. It seems everyone took a crack at making better algorithms to improve quality and size. Some chose to invent new ways and others chose to use existing methods but with their own flare. Kodak tried this with their PhotoCD, but there was a couple other photo processing options that popped up in 90’s. One was Seattle FilmWorks and another was Konica PC PictureShow. Both of which used “proprietary” formats to deliver developed film on disk.
Seattle FilmWorks later called PhotoWorks, used an image format with the extension SFW and was based on BMP and JPG, but with their own twist. The same goes for the format used by Konica’s PC PictureShow.
If you took your film in to be developed at one of Konica’s photo labs, you could could have those images put on a diskette or later a CD-R. The disks came with software to view your photos called PC PhotoShow. The images stored on disk where in another proprietary format with the extension KQP. The KQP format was actually licensed from another company called Pegasus Imaging Corporation, later known as Accusoft. They developed their own way to compress a JPEG file which they called an ePic. An SDK called PICTools was offered for many years, but seems not to be available anymore.
ePIC (Proprietary)
Supports PIC format compression, replacing the JPEG Huffman encoder with the proprietary ELS entropy encoder for 15% more compression.
Can be losslessly converted back to JPEG format using Op_RORE.
A search on the internet for Konica KQP shows quite a few people over the years wondering what to do with their old disks and converting the old format to JPG, only to find a lack of information and available tools to do so. One such person used python to edit the file and making the file renderable as a JPG. While the method worked well for their KQP files, it might not work for all of them. Let’s look closer and understand why.
At first glance the file appears to be a Bitmap (BMP), and it does have a Bitmap header claiming to have JPEG compression, but if we look a little further into the file.
identify -verbose Sample.PIC identify: length and filesize do not match `Sample.PIC' @ error/bmp.c/ReadBMPImage/950. identify: unrecognized compression `Sample.PIC' @ error/bmp.c/ReadBMPImage/1019.
We find a JPG marker, in fact almost the whole jpg file is included, except the quantization tables for luminance and chrominance which are needed to properly display the image. This is the area the Pegasus company thought they could encode better to further compress the image. Their method was to use a new algorithm called ELS (Entropy Logarithmic-Scale). This new method was used by the PICTools software to make a Pegasus PIC file while Konica used it for their KQP format. They are identical. By choosing the luminance and chrominance values during compression, you could make a highly compressed image, but required specific software to render.
Pegasus also made use of a special custom APP marker (PIC) within the JPEG structure of the PIC/KQP and also any JPG compressed using their software. This marker which takes up around 8 bytes holds the luminance and chrominance values. Take the above sample for instance, it is compressing the image with a Luminance of 25 and a Chrominance of 30, these are integer values and in hex they would be “19” and “1E” respectively.
So in theory one could strip out any part of the file before the JPG beginning of file magic bytes (FF D8 FF E0), locate the APP marker, use the values to generate the two quantization tables, insert them in the appropriate spot and save out a JPG file.
This may be the case for the first few versions of the ePic format, but later versions got more complicated. It seems a “PIC2” version replaced the earlier versions and this format is a little more complicated.
Instead of the Bitmap (BMP) header, a proprietary PIC2 header is used, still containing a JPG in the JFIF format along with a the PIC APP marker, but encoded in a way that the simple method of adding a quantization table may not work. With the original format the JPG and the PIC/KQP were approximately the same size, this new version significantly reduces the size of the PIC/KQP in comparison with the JPG.
The ELS compression technology used in the ePic format seems to be patented by Pegasus and Accusoft, but is not entirely hidden as the libavcodec library includes a ELS decoder. Might be a fun project to use the code to decode the PIC/KQP formats fully.
In the meantime, a signature identifying the two versions should be added to PRONOM. Check out my proposal on my GitHub. If you need to convert your KQP or PIC files back to JPG here are a few links:
